OK, any one denomination doesn’t have a monopoly on church, however, perhaps we have a cosy cartel?!<\/p>\n
Well, I’m probably going a bit far there – no one has a monopoly on following Jesus. But isn’t it strange how the presence of denominations or distinct groups does pressurise Christians to either be part of one group or another and people who cross boundaries are called spiritual gypsies.<\/p>\n
Submission to leadership appears to be a major sticking point. Crossing established boundaries does not mean that one is unsubmissive to all, but it might mean that one is more responsive and less neglectful of one’s wider set of brothers and sisters (I perceive that moving (permanently) from one group to another often includes unnecessary acts of rejection and exclusion).<\/p>\n
I wonder if crossing boundaries and participation in multiple groups (albeit a small number) is an alternative to the two most popular ways of change:<\/p>\n
Perhaps there is a third way?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
OK, any one denomination doesn’t have a monopoly on church, however, perhaps we have a cosy cartel?! Continue reading