{"id":4376,"date":"2026-03-02T13:39:36","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T13:39:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/?p=4376"},"modified":"2026-02-24T19:38:43","modified_gmt":"2026-02-24T19:38:43","slug":"a-posture-for-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/?p=4376","title":{"rendered":"A posture for change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">The Church talks a great deal about change. We have strategies for it, consultations about it, anxiety around it, and occasionally conferences dedicated to it. And tbh I\u2019m a great fan of developing a theory of change for organisations. What we rarely develop, however, is a <\/span><span class=\"s3\">posture<\/span><span class=\"s1\"> for it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Posture matters in leadership and culture change science, there is a growing recognition that organisations do not primarily change because they adopt new ideas. They change when their underlying habits, reflexes, and shared assumptions shift. It isn\u2019t the new programme that makes the difference; it\u2019s the new way of seeing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Theologically, that shouldn\u2019t surprise us. Jesus did not begin with a strategy but with a call. When God speaks to Abram in Book of Genesis 12, there is no five-year plan. There is only movement: \u201cGo.\u201d The people of God are formed not as managers of stability but as those attentive enough to move when called and learn on The Way.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">The question for the contemporary Church is not simply, <\/span><span class=\"s3\">What should we do next?<\/span><span class=\"s1\"><br \/>\nIt is, <\/span><span class=\"s3\">Who are we becoming so we are ready when we see the missio die and we can join in, either because of opportunities or because of a sense seeing? <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">In my experience, opportunities for renewal seldom arrive neatly labelled and in most cases they are rarley polite. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">They appear as disruption. As complaint, a funding crisis, a new housing development on the edge of town, a lay leader with an inconvenient idea.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">From a culture change perspective, these moments function as what systems thinkers call \u201cadaptive challenges.\u201d They cannot be solved by technical adjustment alone. They require new learning a level of power relinquishment and often a shift in identity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">And that is precisely where the Church often hesitates. We are guardians of memory we do do hold story, sacrament, and tradition. But when memory becomes preservation it becomes rooted I<span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">\u00a0 <\/span>fear.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">The early church, as described in Acts of the Apostles, was not preserved by its structures rather fuelled by attentiveness. The Spirit disrupts them more often than comforts them. Philip finds himself on a desert road, the whole Peter\u2019s theological framework and worldview is dismantled on a rooftop. Paul\u2019s missionary journeys are redirected mid-course several times <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">So maybe Change is not primarily structural but spiritual.<\/span><span class=\"s1\"> In organisational language, we speak about \u201creadiness for change.\u201d This is not about capacity alone. It is about trust.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Do people trust one another enough to experiment?<br \/>\nDo they trust leadership enough to risk?<br \/>\nDo they trust God enough to release control?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\">With trust, even loss can become generative because people don\u2019t fear change they fear loss \u00a0<span class=\"s1\">The risen Christ still bears scars. Change, in the Christian imagination, is rarely clean. It is redemptive precisely because it carries continuity within transformation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">If we want to be ready for the opportunities that will arise then we must cultivate certain postures long before the moment arrives.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">1. Curiosity over defensiveness<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Cultures that thrive in change ask better questions. Instead of \u201cHow do we stop this?\u201d they ask, \u201cWhat might God be doing here?\u201d Curiosity disarms anxiety. It slows reactivity. It allows discernment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">2. Distributed ownership<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Change science consistently demonstrates that transformation sticks when ownership is shared. If readiness depends on a single heroic leader, it is fragile. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">If it is embedded in the culture of who we are as church and people it is resilient.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">3. Experimentation without panic<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">Healthy systems run small experiments. They prototype. They learn. They iterate. <\/span>The Church, at her best, has always done this. Monastic movements, Methodist class meetings, fresh expressions of worship, none began as dominant models. They began as responses. But experimentation requires permission to fail. And failure requires a theology spacious enough to absorb it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">4. Interior grounding<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">No amount of strategic clarity compensates for unexamined fear and even though people have named that much of the current strategy is rooted in institutional anxiety I\u2019m sill not sure the impact has been fully examined. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s1\">If leaders are internally anxious, the system absorbs it. If leaders are grounded, in prayer, in community, in a secure sense of belovedness, the system can use uncertainty well even as an asset. Perhaps solitude and attentiveness need to become not luxuries but infrastructure. The leader who knows they are held does not grasp for control.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">Despite my activist nature we do not need to chase every opportunit<\/span><span class=\"s1\">y, readiness is not restlessness. To develop a posture for change is not to become reactive or trend-driven rather it is to become attentive. So when the Spirit disturbs our settled patterns our posture sees the opportunity.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">Even before opportunity arises formation will shapes the future<\/span><span class=\"s1\"> and the future of the Church is being formed long before it is revealed. <\/span><span class=\"s1\">In quiet PCC meetings we build trust, we form leaders who choose prayer over panic and congregations who practise curiosity rather than complaint. <\/span>Let\u2019s grow communities willing to bless what is emerging without clinging to what is fading. Change readiness is not achieved through urgency but cultivated through formation. The question, then, is not whether change will come but whether we will have become the kind of people who can recognise it as gift rather than threat.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Church talks a great deal about change. We have strategies for it, consultations about it, anxiety around it, and occasionally conferences dedicated to it. And tbh I\u2019m a great fan of developing a theory of change for organisations. What &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/?p=4376\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,122,123],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-church","category-fresh-expressions","category-mixed-ecology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4376"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4381,"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4376\/revisions\/4381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sundaypapers.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}